Summary

Portrait of Harry Blackmun Harry Blackmun Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company v…

If an insurer were liable for such damages only upon proof that it was at fault independently, it would have an incentive to minimize oversight of its agents. Imposing liability without independent fault deters fraud more than a less stringent rule. It therefore rationally advances the State's goal. We cannot say this is a violation of Fourteenth Amendment due process.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harry Blackmun Harry Blackmun Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company v…

Alabama's common-law rule is that a corporation is liable for both compensatory and punitive damages for the fraud of its employee effected within the scope of his employment. We cannot say that this does not rationally advance the State's interest in minimizing fraud. Alabama long has applied this rule in the insurance context, for it has determined that an insurer is more likely to prevent an agent's fraud if given sufficient financial incentive to do so.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature