Summary

Portrait of Harry Blackmun Harry Blackmun,  Relford v. Commandant, U.S. Disciplinary Barracks…

“ This leads us to hold, and we do so hold, that when a serviceman is charged with an offense committed within or at the geographical boundary of a military post and violative of the security of a person or of property there, that offense may be tried by a court-martial. Expressing it another way: a serviceman's crime against the person of an individual upon the base or against property on the base is 'service connected,' within the meaning of that requirement as specified in O'Callahan, 395 U.S., at 272, 89 S.Ct., at 1690. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harry Blackmun Harry Blackmun,  Relford v. Commandant, U.S. Disciplinary Barracks…

“ By this measure, Relford's alleged offenses were obviously service connected. There is, therefore, no constitutional or statutory barrier and Relford was properly tried by a court-martial.
We recognize that any ad hoc approach leaves outer boundaries undetermined. O'Callahan marks an area, perhaps not the limit, for the concern of the civil courts and where the military may not enter. The case today marks an area, perhaps not the limit, where the court-martial is appropriate and permissible. What lies between is for decision at another time.
”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature