Summary

Henry Baldwin McCracken v. Hayward — Opinion of the Court

If any subsequent law affect to diminish the duty, or to impair the right, it necessarily bears on the obligation of the contract in favor of one party, to the injury of the other; hence any law, which in its operation amounts to a denial or obstruction of the rights accruing by a contract, though professing to act only on the remedy, is directly obnoxious to the prohibition of the Constitution.
Source: Wikisource

Henry Baldwin McCracken v. Hayward — Opinion of the Court

The agitation it is understood, was one prominent reason for the introduction of the act of Congress of 1828. It repealed and rules made by the courts of the United States regulating final process, in all the districts, and adopted the execution laws of the respective states, as they then stood; and if nothing more had been done, future legislation on the subject, by the states, would have been cut off. Congress, however, foreseeing new states might come into the Union, to which the act would not apply
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature