Summary

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown United States v. King (147 U.S. 676…

Under such circumstances, when the law provides expressly for the appointment of a deputy, and authorizes the clerk to pay his compensation as a part of his office expenses, there can be no question that his acts as such deputy should be recognized as the acts of the clerk himself, and that the clerk is entitled to like fees for the performance of such acts.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown United States v. King (147 U.S. 676…

It is unnecessary to decide whether, when the district consists of two divisions, and courts are held in both divisions by the same judge and officers, they are one court or two. It is sufficient for the purpose of this case to hold that the sessions are separate, and that the clerk is entitled to charge for his own attendance at one place, and for that of his deputy at another.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown United States v. King (147 U.S. 676…

As the clerk is not a jury commissioner eo nomine, it is difficult to see how he could be paid out of an appropriation for jury commissioners, or how these appropriation bills enlarge his rights, and, unless he is entitled to extra compensation as clerk for these duties, there would seem to be no appropriation from which he could be paid. While the duties of the clerk are similar to those of the commissioner, there is nothing in the language to indicate that the clerk did not act as clerk in performing such duties, or that he became ex officio a jury commissioner.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature