Summary

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown Western Electric Company v. La Rue…

The employment of this spring in connection with the sounder is such a new or double use as would occur to an ordinary mechanic who had seen the Edwards key in operation. It brought into play no faculty of invention. While the promotion of an old device, such, for instance, as a torsional spring, to a new sphere of action, in which it performs a new function, involves invention, the transfer or adaptation of the same device to a similar sphere of action, where it performs substantially the same function, does not involve invention.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown Western Electric Company v. La Rue…

The claim that defendant does not use the adjusting screws is equally without foundation. Indeed, his suggestion is disposed of by defendant's own expert, who testifies to finding adjusting screws having a relation to the sounder similar to that of the screws, H, H', to the lever of the key in the patent, but he says that in the sounder they did not appear to have any effect upon the retractile force applied to the lever. It is evident, on examination, that their functions are practically the same in every particular.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown Western Electric Company v. La Rue…

Assuming, how, ever, what as a matter of fact seems doubtful, that the lever of the sounder is not a circuit-breaking lever, the objection loses all its force in view of the language of the third claim,-the only one found to be infringed,-in which the limitation of the circuit-breaking lever is omitted, and a 'lever fulcrumed upon a torsional spring' is substituted.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature