Summary

Portrait of Henry Fielding Henry Fielding An Enquiry into the Causes of the late Increase of Robbers… (1751)

So if one Man had bought another's Goods of the Thief, though he had known them to be stolen, if he had given the just Value for them, he would not have become an Accessary [2] . But if he had bought them at an Undervalue, this, Sir Richard Hyde held, would have made him an Accessary. My Lord Hale differs from his Opinion, and his Reason to some Readers may seem a pleasant one; for if there be any odds (says he) he that gives more, benefits the Felon more than he that gives less than Value. However this, his Lordship thinks, may be a Misdemeanor punishable by Fine and Imprisonment
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Henry Fielding Henry Fielding An Enquiry into the Causes of the late Increase of Robbers… (1751)

Among the Jews who live in a certain Place in the City, there have been, and still are, some notable Dealers this Way, who in an almost public Manner have carried on a Trade for many Years with Rotterdam, where they have their Warehouses and Factors, and whither they export their Goods with prodigious Profit, and as prodigious Impunity.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Henry Fielding Henry Fielding An Enquiry into the Causes of the late Increase of Robbers… (1751)

If a Pickpocket steal several Handkerchiefs, or other Things, to the Value of Twenty Shillings, and the Receiver of these, knowing them to be stolen, is discovered, and both are indicted, the one as Principal, the other as Accessary, as they must be; if the Jury convict the Principal and find the Goods to be of as high Value as a Shilling, he must receive Judgment of Death
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature