Summary

Portrait of Horace Harmon Lurton Horace Harmon Lurton Chicago v. Sturges — Opinion of the Court

The imposition of absolute liability upon the community when property is destroyed through the violence of a mob is not, therefore, an unusual police regulation. Neither is it arbitrary, as not resting upon reasonable grounds of policy. Such a regulation has a tendency to deter the lawless, since the sufferer must be compensated by a tax burden which will fall upon all property, including that of the evil doers as members of the community.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Horace Harmon Lurton Horace Harmon Lurton Chicago v. Sturges — Opinion of the Court

Primarily, governments exist for the maintenance of social order. Hence it is that the obligation of the government to protect life, liberty, and property against the conduct of the indifferent, the careless, and the evil-minded may be regarded as lying at the very foundation of the social compact. A recognition of this supreme obligation is found in those exertions of the legislative power which have as an end the preservation of social order and the protection of the welfare of the public and of the individual.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature