Summary

Portrait of Howell Edmunds Jackson Howell Edmunds Jackson Walters v. City of St. Louis — Opinion of the Court

Therefore, appellants' basic position must be that any legislative classification which distinguishes on its face between wage earners and the self-employed is constitutionally prohibited.
On its face, the ordinance classifies incomes for taxation according to their sources, one category consisting of salary and wage income and the other of profits from self-employment or business enterprise. Classification of earned income as against profits is not uncommon, sometimes to the advantage of the wage earner and sometimes to his disadvantage.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Howell Edmunds Jackson Howell Edmunds Jackson Walters v. City of St. Louis — Opinion of the Court

It may even tax wholesalers of specified articles on account of their occupation without exacting a similar tax on the occupations of wholesale dealers in other articles. Our disapproval of the wisdom or fairness of so doing is not a ground for interference. Ibid. 'When a state Legislature acts within the scope of its authority it is responsible to the people, and their right to change the agents to whom they have intrusted the power is ordinarily deemed a sufficient check upon its abuse.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature