Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corporation…

As a rule no employer, no person can tell them how to perform their pilotage duties. When the law does not prescribe their duties, pilots are usually free to act on their own best judgment while engaged in piloting a vessel. Because of these differences between pilots and towage employees generally, contracts stipulating against a pilot's negligence cannot be likened to contracts stipulating against towers' negligence. It is one thing to permit a company to exempt itself from liability for the negligence of a licensed pilot navigating another company's vessel on that vessel's own power.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corporation…

There are distinctions between a pilotage and a towage exemption clause which make it entirely reasonable to hold one valid and the other invalid. A pilotage clause exempts for the negligence of pilots only; a towage clause exempts from all negligence of all towage employees. Pilots hold a unique position in the maritime world and have been regulated extensively both by the States and Federal Government.' [23] Some state laws make them public officers, chiefly responsible to the State, not to any private employer.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corporation…

These two reasons are no less applicable today than when The Steamer Syracuse and The Wash Gray were decided. And both reasons apply with equal force whether tugs operate as common carriers or contract carriers. [18] The dangers of modern machines make it all the more necessary that negligence be discouraged. And increased maritime traffic of today makes it not less but more important that vessels in American ports be able to obtain towage free of monopolistic compulsions.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature