Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Cameron v. Johnson (381 U.S. 741…

Perhaps at no time in the Nation's history has there been a greater need to make clear to all that the United States Constitution does not render States impotent to require people permitted to advocate views and air grievances on the streets to do so without obstructing the use of those streets by those who want to use them to move from place to place-the primary use for which all the people pay taxes to build and maintain streets.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Cameron v. Johnson (381 U.S. 741…

If that is a valid argument in deciding cases, it is not amiss to point out that the rule which the Court implicitly adopts here is bound to bring an ever-increasing number of cases into federal courts, where state prosecutions will be enjoined until a federal court can first weigh the motives of state officials in instituting prosecutions. This of course means more and more delays between the arrests of people accused of violating state laws and their trials. The law's delays-which many believe are really a guilty man's most effective defense-are bound to be multiplied beyond measure.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Cameron v. Johnson (381 U.S. 741…

It simply modestly provides that those who carry on such activities shall do so in a way that will not obstruct others who want to use the streets to travel or want to go in or out of a public building. The Mississippi statute is narrowly and precisely drawn, patently designed to accomplish this objective. Thus it fits this Court's often-repeated description of the kind of law which should be drawn in the State's exercise of its generally unquestioned constitutional power to regulate picketing and street activities.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature