Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corporation…

A rational system of jurisprudence should not attach inexorable consequences to failure to guess right on a legal question for the solution of which neither statutes nor court opinions have provided even a reasonably certain guide. Where, as here, arguments as to which of two decrees is 'final' may be considered relatively even, an appellate court should be free to find 'finality' in either decree appealed from.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corporation…

By today's decision the creditors of the bankrupt corporation, who were not represented in the trial below, are deprived of their only opportunity to appeal.↑ Paragraph 3 of the 1948 decree reads:↑ The creditors have contended that the interests of the corporation were not adequately represented at the trial because the corporation attorney regarded it as immaterial whether the corporation or Rinke subscribers obtained the recovery.↑ The possible distinctions between finality as to Dickinson and as to Petroleum, listed by the court in footnote 6 of its opinion, seem unsubstantial.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature