Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Edward Katzinger Company v. Chicago Metallic Manufacturing Company…

If we had intended to draw such a fine line, it is hard to believe that such a careful writer as the late Chief Justice would have failed to indicate in the opinion of the mandate of the Court in the Sola case that on remand the trial court, while permitting challenge of the patent to defeat the injunction, must treat the price-fixing provision as severable, and forbid challenge for the purpose of defeating the claim for recovery of royalties.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Edward Katzinger Company v. Chicago Metallic Manufacturing Company…

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court in the MacGregor case ruled that price-fixing provisions in a license agreement such as the one before us were severable from the agreement to pay royalties, and read our Sola case as though it were a holding that a licensee was estopped to challenge a patent's validity except in cases where a licensor sought affirmative relief to enforce price-fixing provisions of a license.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Edward Katzinger Company v. Chicago Metallic Manufacturing Company…

In thus emphasizing the necessity of protecting our competitive economy by keeping open the way for interested persons to challenge the validity of patents which might be shown to be invalid, the Court was but stating an often expressed policy that 'It is the public interest which is dominant in the patent system,' Mercoid Corp.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature