Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black El Dorado Oil Works v. United States…

Whenever we have had occasion to determine such allowances, we have prescribed either per diem or mileage allowances. The railroads cannot be held responsible for the amount of rent reserved by the Car Corporation n an agreement with the shipper as the car may be left idle during the entire period. The car has value to the railroad only when it is used in transporting lading and results in the payment of freight charges.'
Any allowance based on cost to the shipper rather than on the use of the facility furnished violates that principle.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black El Dorado Oil Works v. United States…

Since the facts before the Commission were enough to enable it to find that such profits amount to rebates to shipper-lessees which result in a discrimination against shippers that own cars or use cars furnished by the railroad, the Commission was justified in treating shipper-lessees as a class apart. As the Commission pointed out in its Refrigerator opinion, the history of railroad practices shows that rebates, concessions and favoritism have frequently grown out of the private car system.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black El Dorado Oil Works v. United States…

The Commission's opinion makes it clear that a shipper-lessee is only entitled to receive a just and reasonable allowance for cars while they are actually used by the railroad, even though this allowance might be less than the car rent paid by the shipper. On that subject the Commission said:↑ Petitioners contend that if the car rental cost is the maximum allowable payment, the mileage payments to the Car Company were unlawful.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature