Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Hughes v. Fetter — Opinion of the Court

Wisconsin may be willing to grant a right of action where witnesses will be available in Wisconsin and the courts are acquainted with a detailed local statute and cases construing it. It may not wish to subject residents to suit where out-of-state witnesses will be difficult to bring before the court, and where the court will be faced with the alternative of applying a complex foreign statute-perhaps inconsistent with that of Wisconsin on important issues-or fitting the statute to the Wisconsin pattern.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Hughes v. Fetter — Opinion of the Court

The legislature may well feel that it is better to allow the courts of the State where the accident occurred to construe and apply its own statute, and that the exceptional case where the defendant cannot be served in the State where the accident occurred does not warrant a general statute allowing suit in the Wisconsin courts. The various wrongful death statutes are inconsistent on such issues as beneficiaries, the party who may bring suit, limitations on liability, comparative negligence, and the measure of damages .
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Hughes v. Fetter — Opinion of the Court

IV, § 1 that 'Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts * * * of every other State.' [5] It is also settled that Wisconsin cannot escape this constitutional obligation to enforce the rights and duties validly created under the laws of other states by the simple device of removing jurisdiction from courts otherwise competent. [6] We have recognized, however, that full faith and credit does not automatically compel a forum state to subordinate its own statutory policy to a conflicting public act of another state
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature