Summary

Portrait of J. S. Fletcher J. S. Fletcher Ravensdene Court — 13. The Spoils of Sacrilege (1922)

One of them is in possession of a valuable secret, and he imparts it to the others, or to some of them—a chosen lot. There have been known such cases—where a secret is shared by say five or six men—in which murder after murder occurs until the secret is only held by one or two. A half-share in a thing is worth more than one-sixth, Scarterfield—and a secret of one is far more valuable than a secret shared with three. Do you understand now?"
"I see!" he answered slowly. "You mean that Salter and Noah may have got rid of Netherfield Baxter and that somebody has got rid of them?"
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of J. S. Fletcher J. S. Fletcher Ravensdene Court — 13. The Spoils of Sacrilege (1922)

Well, I think there were men—we don't know who!—that either knew, with absolute certainty, or were pretty sure that Noah Quick, and Salter Quick were in possession of a secret and that one or the other—and perhaps both—carried it on him, in the shape of papers. Each was killed for that secret. The murderers found nothing, in either case.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of J. S. Fletcher J. S. Fletcher Ravensdene Court — 13. The Spoils of Sacrilege (1922)

You see, if my theory is correct, and Baxter told him and Noah, he'd tell them the exact locality."
"Ah, but would he?" said Scarterfield. "He mightn't. He might only give them a general notion. Still—Netherfield it was that Salter asked for."
"That's certain," said I. "And—I'm puzzled why. But I'm puzzled still more about another thing. If the men who murdered Noah and Salter Quick were in possession of the secret as well, why did they rip their clothes to pieces, searching for—something?
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature