Summary

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Baldwin v. Missouri — Opinion of the Court

The creditor, it is conceded, is a permanent resident within the jurisdiction of the State imposing the tax. The debt is property in his hands constituting a portion of his wealth, from which he is under the highest obligation, in common with his fellow-citizens of the same State, to contribute for the support of the government whose protection he enjoys.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Baldwin v. Missouri — Opinion of the Court

Taxation is a practical matter, and if, in the choice of the rule we adopt, we may, as the Court has said in Farmers' Loan & Trust Company v. Minnesota, give some consideration to its practical effect, we ought not, I think, to overturn long-established rules governing the constitutional power to tax, without some consideration of the necessity and of all consequences of the change.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Baldwin v. Missouri — Opinion of the Court

It is not enough to show that the written or printed evidence of ownership may, by the law of the state in which they are physically present, be permitted to be taken in execution or dealt with as reaching that of which they are evidence, even without the presence of the owner . While bonds often are so treated, they are nevertheless in their essence only evidences of debt.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature