Summary

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Russell v. United States (278 U.S. 181…

The United States claim that section 278, Act of 1924, extended the limitation to March, 1930-six years after the assessment. Petitioners deny that the act of June 2, 1924, should be so construed. They maintain that it did not extend the period for suit where an assessment had been made prior to its passage, and say that section 278 (e) (2) , expressly negatives the contrary theory.
When the Revenue Act of 1924 passed, many parties were liable for taxes imposed by former acts-1921, 1918, etc. Against some there were assessments; others had not been assessed.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Russell v. United States (278 U.S. 181…

The amount of income, excess-profits, and war-profits taxes imposed by the Revenue Act of 1921, and by such Act as amended, for the taxable year 1921 and succeeding taxable years, and the amount of income taxes imposed by this Act, shall be assessed within four years after the return was filed, and no proceeding in court for the collection of such taxes shall be begun after the expiration of such period.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature