Summary

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Sim v. Edenborn — Opinion of the Court

Petitioner and his assignors became subscribers while in entire ignorance of respondent's true position. He represented that it was proposed to purchase only valuable and paying properties; that subscriptions were payable in dollars, and not in property; that he had made a subscription for $500,000, payable in dollars; that the enterprise was being organized in good faith; that all, according to their interest, had equal rights and stood on same basis; that every man's dollar was put up against every other man's dollar
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Sim v. Edenborn — Opinion of the Court

For cash paid to them by syndicate members, they delivered an equal amount of stock issued by the corporation. In settlement of his subscription (reduced from $500,000 to $475,000) respondent surrendered the majority stock in United States Iron Company, at a valuation of $70 per share, paid balance in cash, and took new certificates. When he solicited and obtained subscriptions and received payments, he knew subscribers were relying upon him faithfully to act as their agent.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature