Summary

Thurgood Marshall United States Department of Labor v…

Although the allegations in the sparse record before us raise legitimate concerns that black lung claimants may not be able to retain legal counsel and the suspicion that this inability may stem from the Department of Labor's regulation of attorney's fees, concerns and suspicions are insufficient to justify striking down on constitutional grounds "the duly enacted and carefully considered decision of a coequal and representative branch of our Government."
Source: Wikisource

Thurgood Marshall United States Department of Labor v…

Nothing in ASARCO suggests that some of the federal standing requirements are applicable to the States, while others are not. [2] Because respondent has not invoked the authority of any federal court, then, federal standing principles are simply inapplicable to him. Under this Court's clear pronouncement in ASARCO, the only relevant question for us here is whether one of the petitioners has standing to seek review by this Court of the state court's judgment.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature