Summary

Portrait of Jesse Waugh Jesse Waugh Pulchrism: Championing Beauty as the Purpose of Art… (2015)

Beauty was murdered. Striving for beauty in art was replaced by striving to excise beauty from art. Most artists and critics still refuse to see what is staring at them in the face: that they have been hoodwinked. When beauty was removed from its place as the primary purpose of art, art lost its purpose. Pure concept was foisted upon art as an impossible substitute, which was bound to spiral down into the chaos and nothingness we have as "art" today.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Jesse Waugh Jesse Waugh Pulchrism: Championing Beauty as the Purpose of Art… (2015)

Just as he can rationally assign relativity to beauty if he so chooses. Both are logical stances which may superficially resemble opinions, but in fact can be entirely rational deductions. It is therefore within reason for me to assert the absolute position of Beauty as the purpose of art. Any argument against such a stance would be irrational.
Humanity has had centuries to come to a holistic understanding of the dynamics involved in the interplay between light and dark – they do not exist without each other, and if they can exist independently – to what avail?
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Jesse Waugh Jesse Waugh Pulchrism: Championing Beauty as the Purpose of Art… (2015)

Beauty and ugliness must be maintained as separate phenomena, and cannot be transposed by art relativists and subjectivists, if dynamism – not one-sided puritanism – is to prevail and make art beautiful.
Here is the crux of the problem of relativism: If everything is art, then nothing is art. If nothing is art, then everything is art. If everything is beautiful, then nothing is beautiful. If nothing is beautiful, then everything is beautiful.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature