“ Unfortunately, I rather doubt that any list of articles in a single source would necessarily qualify for inclusion as a stand-alone list in wikipedia on the basis of notability guidelines, and a list of and, unfortunately, given the rather widely varied titles articles on the same topics get in different reference sources, it would probably be difficult to get together a list of articles included in multiple reference sources would have questions about which of several variant names to use. ”
Summary
“John Carter/Archives/2014”, is a work by . It explores elements such as list, topics and sources.
Quotes from John Carter/Archives/2014 ()
“ I imagine that for some topics regarding India or other somewhat English language countries, such will be harder, and even harder for countries where English isn't used widely. But I also think that will probably be one thing required for our future development of at least both those entities, and that it won't happen unless someone starts it. I do have access to several paid subscription databanks, although, admittedly, not as many as I would like, and also to the American Reference Book Annuals and some other sources reviewing paid and free databanks. ”
“ Also, a lot of the reference sources are bound to be unreliable and skewed to anglo-american topics. Example take the case of A Chinese Biographical Dictionary by Herbert Allen Giles for example. Although the only biographical dictionary of its kind it is unreliable. Same goes for other reference works, even the DNB contains fictitious entries. A well documented, what-is-reliable-and-what-is-not list will be incredible. ”
