Summary

Portrait of John Catron John Catron Louise v. Ruggles — Opinion of the Court

We can say, with entire confidence, that no such theory of survey can be carried out, taking the objects called for and found as the governing rule; and it is equally certain, in our opinion, that no specific boundaries were contemplated as having been given to Renault's grant when it was made, but that the lines were to be afterwards established by survey, as in cases of Spanish concessions covering improvements where the exterior boundaries were left to the discretion of the surveyor.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Catron John Catron Louise v. Ruggles — Opinion of the Court

When the point of beginning is established on the river, then it is to be meandered up or down, until a straight line will reach a league and a half from the first to the second corner.
It is insisted that the mouth of the streamlet is to be the place of beginning, and that the first line is to run up the river; and that the north-western side line is to meander the streamlet to the old furnace, called for in the grant.
Why the beginning point should be at the mouth of the lead stream, it is difficult to comprehend. The grant was intended to cover Renault's mining establishment
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Catron John Catron Louise v. Ruggles — Opinion of the Court

This suit was brought in 1844, in the Circuit Court for the Missouri District, to recover sections nine and ten, and the half of sections numbers fifteen and sixteen, adjoining to nine and ten, in township thirty-eight north, range two east of the principal meridian; making 1920 acres, of which it is alleged the defendant Ruggles was in possession.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature