John Henry Middleton and Ernest Arthur Gardner

Summary

John Henry Middleton and Ernest Arthur Gardner 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 21… (1911)

The workmanship throughout is unequal, and the hands of several sculptors can be detected On the whole, the execution is not equal to the beauty of the design, and the whole frieze is somewhat marred by an evident desire to produce the maximum of effect with the least possible amount of labour—very different from the almost gem-like finish of the Parthenon frieze. Even the design is inferior to the Athenian one; most of the figures are ungracefully short in their proportions and there is a great want of refined beauty in many of the female hands and faces.
Source: Wikisource

John Henry Middleton and Ernest Arthur Gardner 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 21… (1911)

The main entrance is at the northern end through the pronaos, once defended by a door in the end of the cella and a metal screen, of which traces were found on the two columns of the pronaos. There was no door between the posticum and the cella The general proportions of the fronts resemble those of the Theseum at Athens, except that the entablature is less massive, the columns thicker, and the diminution less—all proportionally speaking. In plan the temple is long in proportion to its width—measuring, on the top of the stylobate, 125 ft.
Source: Wikisource

John Henry Middleton and Ernest Arthur Gardner 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 21… (1911)

A great part of the city wall, built in fine Hellenic masonry, partly polygonal and partly isodomous, and a large square central fortress with a circular projecting tower, are the only remains now traceable—at least without the aid of excavation. The walls, once nearly 2 m. in circuit, are strongly placed on rocks, which slope down to the little river Neda.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature