Summary

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Caritativo v. California — Concurrence

I do insist on the mandatory requirement that some procedure be established for assuring that the warden give ear to a claim that the circumstances warrant his submission of the issue of sanity to a determination in accordance with the procedure set forth in the California statutes.
Surely the right of an insane man not to be executed, a right based on moral principles deeply embedded in the traditions and feelings of our people and itself protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, merits the procedural protection that that Amendment safeguards.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Caritativo v. California — Concurrence

It may well be that if the warden of a California prison cannot act on his arbitrary judgment-for it is inherently arbitrary if the condemned man or those who speak for him are not allowed to be heard-in deciding whether there is good reason to believe that a person about to be executed is insane, that unworthy claims will be put to the warden and perchance add to delays in the execution of the law.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature