Tom C. Clark

“ In fact, California's court held to the contrary, saying, 'At no time has the cause of petitioner's discharge been alleged to be anything but insubordination and a violation of section 1028.1, nor indeed under the record before us could it be.' 163 Cal.App.2d at page 599, 329 P.2d at page 974. Moreover, this finding is buttressed by the language of the order and of California's statute. Both require the employee to answer any interrogation in the field outlined. ”

“ Probationary Period Following First Appointment.↑ It is noteworthy that the California statute requires such information to be given before both state and federal bodies.↑ Nor does petitioner make any attack on the failure of California's statute to afford temporary employees such as he an opportunity to explain his failure to answer questions. It will be noted that permanent employees are granted such a privilege. ”