John Marshall Harlan II

John Marshall Harlan II

Summary

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v…

Within the category of goods and services that can be sold at retail, naturally not every sale can be so classified. The exemption itself excludes any sale for resale and beyond that, references in the legislative history, n. 14, supra, and common parlance certainly suggest that the term retail becomes less apt as the quantity and the price discount increase in a particular transaction. Again, we do not believe the word usage of the industry must be given conclusive force.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v…

After rejecting the industry's usage as controlling, we face the further difficult question of what criteria do determine when business transactions are retail under the Act; to this question it is still less easy to return a clear-cut answer, but our analysis of the matter leads us to conclude that neither Idaho Sheet nor Steepleton qualifies as a retail or service establishment.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v…

No reason appears why the sale of tires for those trucks should be distinguished and not allowed to qualify as retailable items. The strength of the Government's position lies in its readiness to separate big trucks and tires from little trucks and tires. The Secretary, however, seemingly has chosen not to classify truck tires on this basis but instead treats all truck tires as capable of being sold at retail.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature