Summary

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance Company…

The Government points out that the concept of 'sale' is inherently inapposite to the lending of money at interest, and urges that because respondents cannot properly be said to be engaged in the 'saes of goods or services' the exemption cannot as to them come into play even if their activities are recognized as 'retail' in the financial industry.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance Company…

Until 1949, § 13 (a) (2) exempted from the overtime and record-keeping provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act 'Any employee engaged in any retail or service establishment the greater part of whose selling or servicing is in intrastate commerce.' The Administrator early ruled that personal loan companies and other business entities in what may broadly be called the 'financial industry' were not within the scope of that exemption.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature