Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Burnet v. Aluminum Goods Manufacturing Company…

It is conceded that the loss of respondent's advances to the sales company and the investment in its stock was sustained in 1917, was deductible therefore, if at all, in that year, and might properly have been deducted by respondent in a separate return, if a separate return had been permissible. But the government insists that the loss cannot be deducted in the mandatory consolidated return for 1917 because it occurred as the result of 'intercompany' transactions.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature