John Marshall,
Potter v. Gardner — Opinion of the Court
“ But, so far as he has applied the money to the debts of Ezekiel, his responsibility is not, we think, immediate, but depends on the failure of Ezekiel to pay; the decree ought, in the first instance, to be against Ezekiel, and, if the money cannot be obtained from him, then against Elisha R. Potter.No doubt exists of the right of any of the parties to contest the claim of any creditor. ”
