Summary

Portrait of John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens White v. United States — Dissenting Opinion

The dominant note in the successive enactments of Congress relating to diversity jurisdiction, is one of jealous restriction, of avoiding offense to state sensitiveness, and of relieving the federal courts of the overwhelming burden of 'business that intrinsically belongs to the state courts,' in order to keep them free for their distinctive federal business.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens White v. United States — Dissenting Opinion

Workers' compensation is generally a subject of local interest and control with which federal courts have only minimal contact. The Texas Workers' Compensation Act is unusual because employers who carry workers' compensation insurance normally are not parties to the processing of claims that are made against their insurers. Moreover, when an award is made, either the employee or the insurance company may obtain de novo review in a judicial proceeding in which the employee bears the burden of proof regardless of which party requested review.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature