William Rehnquist

William Rehnquist

Summary

Portrait of William Rehnquist William Rehnquist,  Roe v. Wade — Dissenting Opinion (1973)

“ Even today, when society's views on abortion are changing, the very existence of the debate is evidence that the "right" to an abortion is not so universally accepted as the appellant would have us believe.
To reach its result, the Court necessarily has had to find within the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment a right that was apparently completely unknown to the drafters of the Amendment. As early as 1821, the first state law dealing directly with abortion was enacted by the Connecticut Legislature.
”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Rehnquist William Rehnquist,  Roe v. Wade — Dissenting Opinion (1973)

“ The Texas statute is struck down in toto, even though the Court apparently concedes that, at later periods of pregnancy Texas might impose these self-same statutory limitations on abortion. My understanding of past practice is that a statute found [p178] to be invalid as applied to a particular plaintiff, but not unconstitutional as a whole, is not simply "struck down" but is, instead, declared unconstitutional as applied to the fact situation before the Court. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature