Summary

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart,  Roe v. Wade — Concurring Opinion (1973)

“ Justice Harlan once wrote:
[T] he full scope of the liberty guaranteed by the Due Process Clause cannot be found in or limited by the precise terms of the specific guarantees elsewhere provided in the Constitution. This "liberty" is not a series of isolated points pricked out in terms of the taking of property; the freedom of speech, press, and religion; the right to keep and bear arms
”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart,  Roe v. Wade — Concurring Opinion (1973)

“ These are legitimate objectives, amply sufficient to permit a State to regulate abortions as it does other surgical procedures, and perhaps sufficient to permit a State to regulate abortions more stringently, or even to prohibit them in the late stages of pregnancy. But such legislation is not before us, and I think the Court today has thoroughly demonstrated that these state interests cannot constitutionally support the broad abridgment of personal [p171] liberty worked by the existing Texas law. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature