Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Ginsberg v. New York — Dissent

This is not to say that the Court and Anthony Comstock are wrong in concluding that the kind of literature New York condemns does harm. As a matter of fact, the notion of censorship is founded on the belief that speech and press sometimes do harm and therefore can be regulated. I once visited a foreign nation where the regime of censorship was so strict that all I could find in the bookstalls were tracts on religion and tracts on mathematics.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Ginsberg v. New York — Dissent

Today the Court determines the constitutionality of New York's law regulating the sale of literature to children on the basis of the reasonableness of the law in light of the welfare of the child. If the problem of state and federal regulation of 'obscenity' is in the field of substantive due process, I see no reason to limit the legislatures to protecting children alone.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature