Summary

Jonathan Ward American slavery, and the means of its abolition (1840)

But, how absurd to suppose that the constitution forbid Congress to abolish the slave trade within twenty years, and yet, gave that body power to abolish slavery itself immediately!
But it is pleaded, that this power is given to Congress in the fifth article of the amendments, where it is said, “No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.” And does this refer to slaves? Manifestly not. Can persons be deprived of that which they do not possess? To deprive a person of something, implies that he possessed it. And do slaves possess liberty, or property?
Source: Gutenberg

Jonathan Ward American slavery, and the means of its abolition (1840)

The subject of American slavery, if rightly considered, must be to every Christian, and every true patriot, a deeply interesting and painful subject. That our country—which solemnly declared before God and the world, that [5] it is “self-evident” that “all men are created equal, and are endowed with certain inalienable rights, as life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” and which claims to be the freest on earth, and the asylum of the oppressed—should, nevertheless, hold in abject bondage millions of its own people, is a deep stain on our national character.
Source: Gutenberg

Jonathan Ward American slavery, and the means of its abolition (1840)

Free labor is manifestly more profitable than slave labor. The African race possess kind, and generous and grateful feelings; and if treated with humanity and kindness, would labor much more faithfully as freemen for wages, than as slaves under the cruel stimulus of the whip. And if emancipated, there would be no fear of insurrection, or of the slaughter of the whites. And the States, now feeling the withering influence of slavery, would be much better cultivated and far more prosperous.
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature