Summary

Joseph McKenna Marshall v. Burtis — Opinion of the Court

There are 14 assignments of error, some of which attribute error to the judgment, some to the supposed finding of the court of the validity to the deed to plaintiff and invalidity to that of defendant, and assigning ownership of the property to the former and nonownership to the latter. The second and third assignments of error are as follows:
' (2) The said court erred in refusing to sustain the errors assigned on the appeal to it from the district court.
Source: Wikisource

Joseph McKenna Marshall v. Burtis — Opinion of the Court

The answer puts in issue all other averments, and alleges by way of cross complaint that when Friday M. Neahr executed the deed to plaintiff she was under 21 years, to wit, 19 years, which plaintiff knew; that Friday M. Neahr derived the property from her father by a deed of gift, in which it was expressly provided and limited that she should have no power of disposition of said premises until she arrived at the age of 21 years, which plaintiff knew
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature