Summary

Joseph P. Bradley New York Life Insurance Company v…

We do not mean to say, that if the defendant had continued its authority to the agent to act in the receipt of premiums during the war, and he had done so, a payment or tender to him in lawful money of the United States would not have been valid; nor that a stipulation to continue such authority in case of war, made before its occurrence, would not have been a valid stipulation; nor that a policy of life insurance on which no premiums were to be paid, though suspended during the war, might not have revived after its close.
Source: Wikisource

Joseph P. Bradley New York Life Insurance Company v…

In our judgment, the unqualified assumption on which those decisions are based-namely, 'once an agent always an agent;' or, in other words, that an agency continues to exist notwithstanding the occurrence of war between the countries in which the principal and the agent respectively reside-is not correct, and that the continuance of the agency is subject to the qualifications which we have stated above.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature