Summary

Joseph P. Bradley,  New York Life Insurance Company v…

“ We do not mean to say, that if the defendant had continued its authority to the agent to act in the receipt of premiums during the war, and he had done so, a payment or tender to him in lawful money of the United States would not have been valid; nor that a stipulation to continue such authority in case of war, made before its occurrence, would not have been a valid stipulation; nor that a policy of life insurance on which no premiums were to be paid, though suspended during the war, might not have revived after its close. ”
Source: Wikisource

Joseph P. Bradley,  New York Life Insurance Company v…

“ In our judgment, the unqualified assumption on which those decisions are based-namely, 'once an agent always an agent;' or, in other words, that an agency continues to exist notwithstanding the occurrence of war between the countries in which the principal and the agent respectively reside-is not correct, and that the continuance of the agency is subject to the qualifications which we have stated above. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature