“ Philip answered at once: “The realm of England never was S. Peter’s patrimony; it is not so now, and never shall be. John was convicted long ago of treason against his brother Richard, and condemned by the judgement of Richard’s court; therefore John was never rightfully king, and had no power to surrender the kingdom. Moreover, if he ever was rightfully king, he afterwards forfeited his right to the crown by the murder of Arthur, for which he was condemned in our court. And in any case no king or prince can give away his realm without the consent of his barons, who are bound to defend it.” ”
Kate Norgate
Summary
Kate Norgate’s John Lackland examines the turbulent reign of King John of England through the lens of political conflict, feudal duties, and disputed legitimacy. Focused on the king’s disputes with rebellious barons, the work explores themes of royal power, the role of the Church, and the delicate balance of authority between crown and nobility.
Key figures such as Philip Augustus, Richard the Lionheart, and William Marshal emerge as central to John’s struggles, while the text investigates the legal and ethical controversies surrounding fealty, charters, and the governance of the realm. Norgate’s narrative highlights the interaction of personal ambition and institutional allegiance, portraying John’s rule as a crucible of medieval power relations.
Quotes from John Lackland (Kate Norgate)
“ From the moment when the northern barons first asked the king to confirm his great-grandfather’s charter, if not before, John must have known that the hand of the primate was with them in the matter. But he was quite as much alive as they were to the value of such a helper; moreover, he seems to have had the somewhat rare gift of being able to recognize in another man qualities which were conspicuously absent from his own character. Much as he hated Langton, he evidently trusted to his honour and loyalty as implicitly as he trusted to that of William the Marshal. ”
“ Such an accumulation of palatine jurisdictions in the hands of one man was practically equivalent to the setting up of an under-kingdom, with a king uncrowned indeed, but absolutely independent of every secular authority except the supreme king himself; and that exception, as every one knew, was only for the moment; Richard was on the eve of his departure for the Holy Land, and as soon as he was out of reach John would have, within his little realm, practically no superior at all. Moreover, his “lordship of Ireland” had changed its character at his father’s death. ”
