Summary

Portrait of Ketanji Brown Jackson Ketanji Brown Jackson Johnson v. Missouri — Dissent Jackson

We denied Kevin Johnson’s application for an emergency stay of his execution on November 29, 2022, and the State of Missouri has carried out that penalty. Now, one day later, I write to explain my vote to grant his stay request. For the reasons that follow, in my view, there was a likelihood that Johnson would have succeeded on the merits of his federal due process claim, and it was clear that he would (and obviously did) suffer irreparable harm absent a stay. I also believe that the equities weighed in Johnson’s favor.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Ketanji Brown Jackson Ketanji Brown Jackson Johnson v. Missouri — Dissent Jackson

See §547.031.3 (requiring that the court’s findings and conclusions about a properly filed motion to vacate be based, in part, on “evidence presented at the hearing on the motion”) . What is more, the court’s determination that there was not “clear and convincing” evidence to support the motion to vacate in the absence of a hearing in which there would have been a chance to produce such evidence, as the statute requires, transgressed core procedural due process principles.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature