Summary

Lathrop v. Donohue — Opinion of the Court

Even the federal income tax would be suspect. And certainly this source of inhibition is as great if the Integrated Bar wastes its dues on dinners as if it spends them on recommendations to the legislature. Yet I suppose that no one would be willing to contend that every waste of money exacted by some form of compulsion is an abridgment of free speech.
The suggestion that a state-created Integrated Bar amounts to a governmental 'establishment' of political belief is hardly worthy of more serious consideration.
Source: Wikisource

Lathrop v. Donohue — Opinion of the Court

As I understand things, it is said that the operation of the Integrated Bar tends (1) to reduce a dissident member's 'economic capacity' to espouse causes in which he believes; (2) to further governmental 'establishment' of political views; (3) to threaten development of a 'guild system' of closed, self-regulating professions and businesses; (4) to 'drown out' the voice of dissent by requiring all members of the Bar to lend financial support to the views of the majority; and (5) to interfere with freedom of belief by causing 'compelled affirmation' of majority-held views.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature