Summary

Portrait of Levi Woodbury Levi Woodbury Gill v. Oliver's Executors/Dissent Woodbury…

It is true, that the opinion given in the State court in support of its judgment is not entirely free from some grounds for misconception, yet the judgment itself appears right, and, if erroneous, resting as it does wholly on the State laws, it is not competent for us, under this writ of error, to reverse it. We can reverse it only when wrong, and wrong, too, for deciding improperly against some claim under a United States law or treaty.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Levi Woodbury Levi Woodbury Gill v. Oliver's Executors/Dissent Woodbury…

That was the question before the court, and the one they settled; and in deciding that, they overruled the claim of Gill to be so, by virtue of any authority in the treaty or award; and in saying that the fund should go to Oliver's executors, as best entitled, rather than Gill, they did it under their own State laws.
It is a general rule for the State tribunals, and not the commissioners, to settle any conflict between different claimants
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature