Summary

Portrait of Levi Woodbury Levi Woodbury United States v. Chicago — Opinion of the Court

On the contrary, all the streets so laid down on the plan, where the lots contiguous were sold, have been allowed to be opened without opposition by the United States. And it is entirely unsupported by principle or precedent, that an agent, merely by protracting on the plan those streets into the reserved line and amidst lands not sold, nor meant then to be sold, but expressly reserved, could deprive the United States of its title to its real estate, and to its important public works.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Levi Woodbury Levi Woodbury United States v. Chicago — Opinion of the Court

The road having never been opened, the State cannot now condemn the land to any other public use than that to which it is applied by the government, thereby causing an interference or collision. A State cannot open a convenient highway through a powder-magazine, or into the entrenchments of a fort, which exist by order of a government supreme within its sphere.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Levi Woodbury Levi Woodbury United States v. Chicago — Opinion of the Court

In respect to the first objection, we do not propose to decide whether the grant of a preliminary and temporary injunction is a matter of discretion merely, rather than of right. Because, whichever it may be, the questions of division presented here are not those on matters of mere discretion in the court below, but involve the right of the United States in the land proposed to be laid out as a street by the city.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature