Summary

Louis Brandeis Southern Railway Company v. Watts…

The Legislature recognized that the difficulties inherent in valuing a railroad are great. It desired that the valuers should have access to every fact which might aid them in performing their duty. The data concerning the railroads referred to in the act, like the methods of valuation referred to in earlier and later legislation, are among those commonly used when an attempts is made to ascertain the value of a railroad. But they are merely aids. Such data are commonly in the possession of the railroad companies; and are often not readily accessible to others.
Source: Wikisource

Louis Brandeis Southern Railway Company v. Watts…

Payment of the tax is not made a condition precedent to granting a railroad permission to do interstate business. Compare Leloup v. Mobile, 127 U.S. 640, 8 Sup. Ct. 1380, 32 L. Ed. 311; Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Chamberlain, 254 U.S. 113, 119, 41 Sup. Ct. 45, 65 L. Ed. 165. And there is no basis for the contention that the aggregate burden imposed by the property tax, the franchise tax, and the income tax, operates to obstruct interstate commerce.
The remaining objections to the franchise taxes relate merely to the amounts at which they are calculated.
Source: Wikisource

Louis Brandeis Southern Railway Company v. Watts…

But a privilege tax is not converted into a property tax because it is measured by the value of property (compare Clark v. Titusville, 184 U.S. 329, 333, 334, 22 Sup. Ct. 382, 46 L. Ed. 569) ; nor by the fact that in this measure is included property not used in the transportation service. Railroads differ in so many respects from other properties that they may, as a class, be taxed differently or additionally, if that it not inconsistent with the Constitution of the state.
Nor is there any basis for the claim that the Franchise Tax Act violates the commerce clause.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature