Summary

Mahlon Pitney Greene v. Louisville & Interurban Railroad Company…

The court is placed in a dilemma, from which it can only escape by taking that path which, while it involves a nominal departure from the letter of the law, does injury to no one, and secures that uniformity of tax burden which was the sole end of the Constitution. To hold otherwise is to make the restrictions of the Constitution instruments for defeating the very purpose they were intended to subserve. It is to stick in the bark, and to be blind to the substance of things.
Source: Wikisource

Mahlon Pitney Greene v. Louisville & Interurban Railroad Company…

It is equally plain that it makes no difference what basis of valuation-that is, what percentage of full value-may be adopted, provided it be applied to all alike. The adoption of full value has no different effect in distributing the burden than would be gained by adopting 75 per cent, or 50 per cent, or even 10 per cent as the basis-so long as either was applied uniformly. [2] The only difference would be that, supposing the requirements of the treasury remained constant, the rate of taxation would have to be increased as the percentage of valuation was reduced.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature