Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar

Summary

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Dent v. Ferguson (132 U.S. 50)…

We find no authority for the idea that it is the province of a court of equity to make a fraudulent debtor the special object of its favor because he has not received a large enough consideration for his 'confessed fraud.' That court is not a divider of the inheritance of iniquity between the respective heirs of two confederates in fraud.
Source: Wikisource

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Dent v. Ferguson (132 U.S. 50)…

The question arises, if a person conveys his property for the purpose of hindering, delaying, or defrauding his creditors, and for 11 years acquiesces and concurs in the devices, collusive suits, and impositions upon the court in furtherance of this purpose, without taking a single legal step to annul said conveyance or to stop such proceedings, will a court of equity aid him or his heirs to recover the property from the grantee or his heirs after the fraud is accomplished?
Source: Wikisource

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Dent v. Ferguson (132 U.S. 50)…

That claim, stated in his own language, is 'that Ferguson placed his property in Dent's hands, to be used in liquidating his debts, and, when this was done, the property, or so much of it as had not been consumed in the payment of debts, was to be restored to Ferguson, and that in the mean time Ferguson was to have enough of the rents to live on.' Such an arrangement, so entirely inconsistent with the absolute conveyance of the property as executed between the parties, has all the features of a fraud upon creditors.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature