Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar

Summary

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Florsheim v. Schilling — Opinion of the Court

Thus the liability of the India rubber to slip and work out of the gusset is much reduced. When gussets made in this manner are worked into boots or other articles, the stitches by which they are secured are passed through a margin on each side of the gusset, and not through the India-rubber part of the gusset, as heretofore. In order that our invention may be fully understood, and readily carried into effect, we will describe the manner in which we prefer to proceed.
Source: Wikisource

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Florsheim v. Schilling — Opinion of the Court

What I claim as my invention is: (1) In a corset, an elastic section composed of two thicknesses of cloth or material having tubes in combination with the spiral metal springs, E, inclosed by such tubes, and arranged in groups, to regulate the elasticity of the section, such groups being all composed of a single continuous spring passed back and forth through the tubes, and secured at its ends, substantially as described and shown.
Source: Wikisource

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Florsheim v. Schilling — Opinion of the Court

What are the particular features of the improvements which it is alleged distinguish the patent in suit from those contained in the Mills patent? According to the contention of appellants' counsel, they are, (1) the continuous spring; (2) the inelastic margin at the sides of the gusset, whereby it may be attached to the corset without the connecting stitches crossing the springs; (3) the location of the elastic gusset at the sides
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature