Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar

Summary

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Young v. Clarendon — Opinion of the Court

Whether the railroad acquired a cause of action against the township by the failure to deliver the bonds, or by their cancellation prior to the lapse of the three years fixed by the statute, on the one hand, or the whole project was a mere fiasco, on the other, and, if such cause of action arose, what was its precise nature and form, are matters rather of curious speculation than of practical consequence. If no real cause of action arose, that is the end of the matter.
Source: Wikisource

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Young v. Clarendon — Opinion of the Court

All the steps directed by the statute to be taken leading up to the final act of delivery to the railroad company constitute one progressive process. To adopt the language of the court in the McGarrahan Case, supra, 'each and every one of the integral parts of the execution is essential to the validity of the bond.' We hold, therefore, that since the bonds were never indorsed and delivered by the treasurer, as required by the statute, they never became operative. The act of delivery is essential to the existence of any deed, bond, or note.
Source: Wikisource

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Young v. Clarendon — Opinion of the Court

While therefore it is possible that a loan may be so proposed and accepted as to give to the intended borrower a cause of action for any failure to perform the agreement, and a right to recover damages at law, yet on a bill in the nature either of a bill for specific performance or for an equitable garnishment, the court may well inquire where is the substantial equity in the case.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature