Summary

Marcus Cornelius Fronto The Correspondence of Marcus Cornelius Fronto… (1920)

When that book and those words were read to Fronto, while I and many more were sitting with him, it was the opinion of a person present, and one by no means unlearned, that it was absurd and frigid in a historical work to say "with many mortals" instead of "with many men," and savoured too much of poetry: then said Fronto to him who had expressed this view:
"Do you, a man of the correctest taste in other things, affirm that you think 'many mortals' an absurd and frigid expression?
Source: Wikisource

Marcus Cornelius Fronto The Correspondence of Marcus Cornelius Fronto… (1920)

For my part, unless my love and reverence for that writer and for all the language of our old authors blinds my judgment, I hold that, in so describing the concourse of nearly a whole city, 'mortals' is an expression far and away more ample, more comprehensive, and more copious than simply 'men.' For the phrase multi homines can be contracted and compressed to mean quite a moderate number, while multi mortales in some mysterious way and by some subtle nuance includes almost the whole body of citizens of every class and age and sex.
Source: Wikisource

Marcus Cornelius Fronto The Correspondence of Marcus Cornelius Fronto… (1920)

Then Fronto said to Favorinus:
"We do not go as far as to deny that the Greek language, in which you seem to be well-read, is more comprehensive and copious than our own: still in designating those colours which you have just mentioned, we are not so poorly off as you seem to suppose. For, in fact, those words which you lately mentioned, rufus and ruber, are not our only ones to denote the colour red; but we have others besides and more than the Greek ones mentioned by you.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature