Summary

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Gibson v. United States (166 U.S. 269…

Beyond constitutional restraint or legislative power, there is none but the legislative will, tempered by its sense of justice, which has happily been sufficient, in most cases, to protect the citizen. Compensation has been provided for every injury which could be foreseen, whether within the constitutional injunction or not, in all laws for public works by the state or a corporation; though cases of damage have occurred which could neither be anticipated nor brought within the benefit of the provision by the most strained construction.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Gibson v. United States (166 U.S. 269…

All navigable waters are under the control of the United States for the purpose of regulating and improving navigation, and although the title to the shore and submerged soil is in the various states, and individual owners under them, it is always subject to the servitude in respect of navigation created in favor of the federal government by the constitution.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Gibson v. United States (166 U.S. 269…

The fifth amendment to the constitution of the United States provides that private property shall not 'be taken for public use without just compensation.' Here, however, the damage of which Mrs. Gibson complained was not the result of the taking of any part of her property, whether upland or submerged, or a direct invasion thereof, but the incidental consequence of the lawful and proper exercise of a governmental power.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature