Summary

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Northern Pacific Railway Company v…

The rule in the state of Washington as to adverse possession is thus stated by the supreme court in this case:
'One holding land adversely to the rights of another can be devested only by the action of the other, even with a better right, within the time prescribed by the statute of limitations; and this is true, even though he may have originally entered under a void grant of sale. But his claim ripens into a perfect title and becomes absolute, if such possession is not disturbed within the time prescribed.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Northern Pacific Railway Company v…

Congress having plainly manifested its intention that the title to and possession of the right of way should continue in the original grantee, its successors and assigns, so long as the railroad was maintained, the possession by individuals of portions of the right of way cannot be treated, without overthrowing the act of Congress, as forming the basis of an adverse possession which may ripen into a title good as against the railroad company.' 190 U.S. 271, 272, 47 L. ed.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Northern Pacific Railway Company v…

It has stood by and seen improvements made thereon, and, in the case of defendant Brown, an agreement was entered into between him and General Sprague, who was then the general superintendent of the Northern Pacific Railroad Company, that they would plat their lots so that the streets of the addition which the railroad company was dedicating would correspond with and meet the streets which Brown was dedicating to the city of Spokane, and the agreement was carried out by arranging the streets in accordance therewith.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature