Summary

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Searl v. School-Dist. No. 2 — Opinion of the Court

Did the just compensation thus secured to the owner of property, taken in the exercise of the power of eminent domain, include in this instance payment to the plaintiff in error for the improvements made by the school-district in order to carry out the specific use and purpose for which the land was required? Could plaintiff in error properly insist that the loss of the school-house was an injury which he sustained by reason of the taking?
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Searl v. School-Dist. No. 2 — Opinion of the Court

The civil law recognized the principle of reimbursing to the bona fide possessor the expense of his improvements, if he was removed from his possession by the legal owner, by allowing him the increase in the value of the land created thereby. And the betterment laws of the several states proceed upon that equitable view. The right of recovery, where the occupant in good faith believes himself to be the owner, is declared to stand upon a principle of natural justice and equity
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature